Conservation Reserve Program in Lafayette County, Wisconsin, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 324
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Lafayette County, Wisconsin totaled $3,265,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Tyler J Leahy | Cuba City, WI 53807 | $37,938 |
22 | Karl Hirsbrunner And Jane Hirsbrunner Revoc Trust | Darlington, WI 53530 | $37,615 |
23 | Tri-l Acres LLC | Darlington, WI 53530 | $37,026 |
24 | Luke R. Mcguire | Mineral Point, WI 53565 | $36,937 |
25 | David C Kruser | Hazel Green, WI 53811 | $34,667 |
26 | Chad R Buschor | Darlington, WI 53530 | $33,290 |
27 | Gerald A Ryser | Blanchardville, WI 53516 | $31,054 |
28 | Robert A Coogan | Mineral Point, WI 53565 | $30,171 |
29 | Timothy Edward James | Greenville, WI 54942 | $29,650 |
30 | Charles R Wellington | Monroe, WI 53566 | $29,207 |
31 | Brothers Mcd LLC | Dodgeville, WI 53533 | $28,760 |
32 | Linda L Willborn | Argyle, WI 53504 | $27,342 |
33 | Kyle S Van Bogaert | Belmont, WI 53510 | $27,226 |
34 | Bruce Geissbuhler | Darlington, WI 53530 | $26,477 |
35 | Ronald D Hermanson | Monroe, WI 53566 | $25,481 |
36 | Steven Rear | Argyle, WI 53504 | $25,269 |
37 | Wedel Oak Woods Foundation, Inc. | Village Of Lakewood, IL 60014 | $23,801 |
38 | Andrews Andrews & Bonin LLC | Cuba City, WI 53807 | $22,913 |
39 | Scott Mathys | Blanchardville, WI 53516 | $22,865 |
40 | John W Larson | Argyle, WI 53504 | $22,656 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”