Market Loss Assistance Program in Langlade County, Wisconsin, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 378
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Langlade County, Wisconsin totaled $2,116,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Schroeder Bros Farms Inc | Antigo, WI 54409 | $82,545 |
2 | Maly Farms Inc | Bryant, WI 54418 | $81,587 |
3 | Shestaks Inc | Bryant, WI 54418 | $64,891 |
4 | Jerome Wahleithner | White Lake, WI 54491 | $49,498 |
5 | John R Nagel | Deerbrook, WI 54424 | $41,387 |
6 | Igls Homestead Inc | Antigo, WI 54409 | $38,400 |
7 | Houdek Farms Inc | Bryant, WI 54418 | $35,442 |
8 | Polar Enterprises LLC | Bryant, WI 54418 | $34,512 |
9 | Popelka Family Limited Partnership Ltd | White Lake, WI 54491 | $30,182 |
10 | Dennis Halambeck | Deerbrook, WI 54424 | $30,100 |
11 | Allen Kolpack | Antigo, WI 54409 | $29,676 |
12 | J W Mattek & Sons Inc | Deerbrook, WI 54424 | $27,759 |
13 | Sandy Ridge Farms Partnership | Bryant, WI 54418 | $26,376 |
14 | Terrence Koeppel | Antigo, WI 54409 | $24,291 |
15 | Flight Farm Inc | Antigo, WI 54409 | $23,557 |
16 | Andy P Kostelny | White Lake, WI 54491 | $23,481 |
17 | Robert J Parilek Sr | Antigo, WI 54409 | $23,387 |
18 | Steven J Menting | Antigo, WI 54409 | $23,252 |
19 | Terrance Depies | Antigo, WI 54409 | $22,344 |
20 | William Kolpack | Bryant, WI 54418 | $21,601 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>