Conservation Reserve Program in Marinette County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 171
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Marinette County, Wisconsin totaled $1,409,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ernest Povolo | Iron Mountain, MI 49801 | $2,232 |
122 | Betty Podoski | Coleman, WI 54112 | $1,985 |
123 | Charles Borkowski | Crivitz, WI 54114 | $1,931 |
124 | Joan Bantle | Marinette, WI 54143 | $1,907 |
125 | Jeffrey E Ott | Kewaskum, WI 53040 | $1,678 |
126 | Lee Meyers | De Pere, WI 54115 | $1,568 |
127 | Russell Cherry | Porterfield, WI 54159 | $1,530 |
128 | Stanley Lewandowski | Wausaukee, WI 54177 | $1,504 |
129 | Hildegard Kasal | Peshtigo, WI 54157 | $1,458 |
130 | Cyrill J Grasser | Park Ridge, IL 60068 | $1,425 |
131 | Jeannine Porfilio | Milwaukee, WI 53221 | $1,230 |
132 | Susan B Grzybowski | Oak Hill, FL 32759 | $1,187 |
133 | Alice Polzin | Porterfield, WI 54159 | $1,164 |
134 | Todd Kenneth Polzin Sr | Porterfield, WI 54159 | $1,164 |
135 | Twin Creek Farm LLC | Porterfield, WI 54159 | $1,104 |
136 | Jason Zeitler | Pound, WI 54161 | $1,103 |
137 | Thomas Joy Jr | Peshtigo, WI 54157 | $1,095 |
138 | Gary De Clark | Kingsford, MI 49802 | $1,043 |
139 | Raymond K Mattrisch | Pound, WI 54161 | $1,038 |
140 | Marshall Timper | Cleveland, WI 53015 | $996 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”