Farm Subsidy information
Marinette County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Marinette County, Wisconsin, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 52
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Marinette County, Wisconsin totaled $5,914,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | B & D Dairy Farm LLC | Pound, WI 54161 | $179,788 |
2 | Van De Walle Farms LLC | Crivitz, WI 54114 | $135,727 |
3 | Allen John Noll | Coleman, WI 54112 | $131,241 |
4 | Fendryk Brothers | Crivitz, WI 54114 | $130,274 |
5 | Hoffman Happy Holsteins LLC | Peshtigo, WI 54157 | $128,448 |
6 | Darga Farms LLC | Pound, WI 54161 | $128,277 |
7 | Stoney Acres Dairy LLC | Wausaukee, WI 54177 | $127,184 |
8 | Golden Ridge Dairy LLC | Crivitz, WI 54114 | $125,853 |
9 | Dura Family Dairy LLC | Peshtigo, WI 54157 | $124,216 |
10 | Kaufman Farms LLC | Porterfield, WI 54159 | $123,543 |
11 | Krzewina Farms LLC | Crivitz, WI 54114 | $123,193 |
12 | Michael Allen Russ | Wausaukee, WI 54177 | $122,969 |
13 | Caine Farms Inc | Wausaukee, WI 54177 | $122,785 |
14 | Rohde Farms LLC | Coleman, WI 54112 | $122,620 |
15 | Roaming Acres Dairy LLC | Wausaukee, WI 54177 | $122,338 |
16 | Schwittay Farms LLC | Peshtigo, WI 54157 | $122,059 |
17 | Steven C Nor | Peshtigo, WI 54157 | $120,853 |
18 | D & L Rusch Dairy Inc | Pound, WI 54161 | $120,630 |
19 | Drees Dairy Farms LLC | Peshtigo, WI 54157 | $120,630 |
20 | Wojciehowski Brothers Farms | Porterfield, WI 54159 | $115,142 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>