Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Oconto County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 392
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Oconto County, Wisconsin totaled $9,972,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Engebretsen Brothers LLC | Cecil, WI 54111 | $112,250 |
22 | Pethke Farm LLC | Suring, WI 54174 | $105,017 |
23 | Andrew J Rueden | Kaukauna, WI 54130 | $98,230 |
24 | Peters Grain Farms LLC | Oconto, WI 54153 | $91,689 |
25 | Sobeck Dairy LLC | Lena, WI 54139 | $88,768 |
26 | Stoll Brothers Farms | Oconto Falls, WI 54154 | $85,806 |
27 | Gohr Dairy LLC | Krakow, WI 54137 | $85,646 |
28 | Hallada Farms Inc | Lena, WI 54139 | $83,602 |
29 | Riegert Farms LLC | Suring, WI 54174 | $83,316 |
30 | Jonathan Wesley Herzog | Gillett, WI 54124 | $82,299 |
31 | Ryan Raymond Brock | Gillett, WI 54124 | $81,565 |
32 | Jody Lauersdorf | Gillett, WI 54124 | $79,958 |
33 | Ronald Robert Wussow | Cecil, WI 54111 | $76,231 |
34 | James Bernard Mahoney | Suring, WI 54174 | $72,374 |
35 | Charles Walter Kehl | Lena, WI 54139 | $69,275 |
36 | Pagel Dairy Farms Inc | Lena, WI 54139 | $68,175 |
37 | Dennis Blazek | Oconto Falls, WI 54154 | $64,329 |
38 | John Rybicki Jr | Krakow, WI 54137 | $63,775 |
39 | Fabry Farms LLC | Oconto Falls, WI 54154 | $63,418 |
40 | Daniel J Olson | Lena, WI 54139 | $56,272 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”