Dairy Programs in Oconto County, Wisconsin, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 88
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Oconto County, Wisconsin totaled $902,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Kenneth Charles Leuer | Oconto, WI 54153 | $7,779 |
42 | Ronald Robert Wussow | Cecil, WI 54111 | $7,644 |
43 | Gohr Farms Inc | Sobieski, WI 54171 | $7,291 |
44 | Dennis Roger Matelski | Suring, WI 54174 | $6,979 |
45 | Dillon Robert Matelski | Suring, WI 54174 | $6,979 |
46 | Timothy Lee Peetz | Lena, WI 54139 | $6,712 |
47 | Peter Steffel | Oconto Falls, WI 54154 | $6,625 |
48 | Eric J Gille | Sobieski, WI 54171 | $6,624 |
49 | Gary Michael Harley | Coleman, WI 54112 | $5,996 |
50 | Cowtown Acres LLC | Coleman, WI 54112 | $5,486 |
51 | Suring Farms LLC | Suring, WI 54174 | $5,055 |
52 | Kostreva Farms LLC | Pound, WI 54161 | $5,030 |
53 | Steven Kusch | Abrams, WI 54101 | $4,446 |
54 | Thomas Daniel Przybylski | Pulaski, WI 54162 | $3,942 |
55 | Nathan Yoder | Little Suamico, WI 54141 | $3,745 |
56 | Michele K Jenquine | Lena, WI 54139 | $3,135 |
57 | Dean Hansen | Gillett, WI 54124 | $3,099 |
58 | Stanley J Cook | Lena, WI 54139 | $3,010 |
59 | Bryan Matthew Johnson | Sobieski, WI 54171 | $2,972 |
60 | Derek Steven Solomon | Oconto Falls, WI 54154 | $2,937 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”