Farm Subsidy information
Oconto County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Oconto County, Wisconsin, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 148
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Oconto County, Wisconsin totaled $7,516,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Ronald Leja | Abrams, WI 54101 | $7,295 |
62 | Gohr Farms Inc | Sobieski, WI 54171 | $7,291 |
63 | Dennis Roger Matelski | Suring, WI 54174 | $6,979 |
64 | Dillon Robert Matelski | Suring, WI 54174 | $6,979 |
65 | Rodger Kaczmarowski | Pulaski, WI 54162 | $6,905 |
66 | Alan P Shallow | Lena, WI 54139 | $6,856 |
67 | Timothy Lee Peetz | Lena, WI 54139 | $6,712 |
68 | Peter Steffel | Oconto Falls, WI 54154 | $6,625 |
69 | Eric J Gille | Sobieski, WI 54171 | $6,624 |
70 | Mark Andrew Hallada | Coleman, WI 54112 | $6,147 |
71 | Lavern Marquardt | Lena, WI 54139 | $5,945 |
72 | Richard M Fischer | Pulaski, WI 54162 | $5,858 |
73 | Jason Timothy Hodkiewicz | Sobieski, WI 54171 | $5,738 |
74 | Thomas Daniel Przybylski | Pulaski, WI 54162 | $5,534 |
75 | Suring Farms LLC | Suring, WI 54174 | $5,525 |
76 | Cowtown Acres LLC | Coleman, WI 54112 | $5,486 |
77 | Vincent Solomon | Oconto Falls, WI 54154 | $5,135 |
78 | Hayes Family Farm LLC | Abrams, WI 54101 | $4,688 |
79 | Slang Farms LLC | Suring, WI 54174 | $4,644 |
80 | Gary A Jenquine | Lena, WI 54139 | $3,987 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”