Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Oconto County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 392
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Oconto County, Wisconsin totaled $9,972,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Keith Gerard Vande Hey | Greenleaf, WI 54126 | $24,753 |
82 | Stanley J Cook | Lena, WI 54139 | $24,719 |
83 | Harmony Meadow Farms LLC | Oconto, WI 54153 | $24,682 |
84 | Michael C Kleiber | Gillett, WI 54124 | $23,957 |
85 | Nathan Yoder | Little Suamico, WI 54141 | $23,594 |
86 | Dillon Robert Matelski | Suring, WI 54174 | $23,305 |
87 | Alan James Riegert | Suring, WI 54174 | $23,268 |
88 | Brandon Marks | Pound, WI 54161 | $22,984 |
89 | Craig Joseph Lacount | Sobieski, WI 54171 | $22,930 |
90 | Richard M Fischer | Pulaski, WI 54162 | $22,544 |
91 | Brian Watts Inc | Oconto, WI 54153 | $22,211 |
92 | Bradley D Schaal | Gillett, WI 54124 | $22,072 |
93 | Andrew J Schaal | Gillett, WI 54124 | $22,072 |
94 | Matthew W Schaal | Gillett, WI 54124 | $22,017 |
95 | Wallace Schaal | Gillett, WI 54124 | $22,006 |
96 | Roger Delzer | Oconto Falls, WI 54154 | $21,871 |
97 | Dennis Roger Matelski | Suring, WI 54174 | $21,702 |
98 | Richard Lee Gardebrecht | Suring, WI 54174 | $21,645 |
99 | Joyce E Fifield | Gillett, WI 54124 | $20,719 |
100 | Eric J Gille | Sobieski, WI 54171 | $20,659 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”