Dairy Programs in Oconto County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 597
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Oconto County, Wisconsin totaled $29,061,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Jeffrey B Shallow | Lena, WI 54139 | $94,912 |
82 | Nathan Yoder | Little Suamico, WI 54141 | $93,875 |
83 | H-w Farms LLC | Oconto Falls, WI 54154 | $93,170 |
84 | Dennis Roger Matelski | Suring, WI 54174 | $92,825 |
85 | Ronald J Rowell | Oconto Falls, WI 54154 | $92,188 |
86 | Joshua Fredrick Staudenmaier | Lena, WI 54139 | $90,992 |
87 | John Wolf | Oconto Falls, WI 54154 | $90,359 |
88 | James John Olson | Gillett, WI 54124 | $90,049 |
89 | Thomas Daniel Przybylski | Pulaski, WI 54162 | $87,909 |
90 | Derek Steven Solomon | Oconto Falls, WI 54154 | $84,376 |
91 | Porior Brothers LLC | Pound, WI 54161 | $83,876 |
92 | William Peter Shallow | Lena, WI 54139 | $83,448 |
93 | Finger Century Farm LLC | Oconto, WI 54153 | $82,411 |
94 | Gregory Alfred Schliep | Abrams, WI 54101 | $82,045 |
95 | Steven Kusch | Abrams, WI 54101 | $82,006 |
96 | Stoll Brothers Farms | Oconto Falls, WI 54154 | $81,007 |
97 | Gary Paul Tuschy | Suring, WI 54174 | $80,845 |
98 | Vincent Solomon | Oconto Falls, WI 54154 | $80,464 |
99 | Richard A Nooyen | Pulaski, WI 54162 | $79,159 |
100 | Phillip Tachick | Suring, WI 54174 | $78,650 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”