Farm Subsidy information
Oconto County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Oconto County, Wisconsin, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 471
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Oconto County, Wisconsin totaled $12,722,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Eric J Gille | Sobieski, WI 54171 | $28,488 |
82 | Zachary Dale Kuhn | Cecil, WI 54111 | $27,704 |
83 | Richard M Fischer | Pulaski, WI 54162 | $27,078 |
84 | Le Mere Farms LLC | Oconto, WI 54153 | $26,767 |
85 | William Peter Shallow | Lena, WI 54139 | $26,295 |
86 | Roger Delzer | Oconto Falls, WI 54154 | $26,281 |
87 | Joshua Fredrick Staudenmaier | Lena, WI 54139 | $25,965 |
88 | Boomsma Farms LLC-prior To 2021 | Oconto, WI 54153 | $25,261 |
89 | Virtues Farms LLC | Little Suamico, WI 54141 | $25,014 |
90 | Harmony Meadow Farms LLC | Oconto, WI 54153 | $24,682 |
91 | John Rybicki Jr | Krakow, WI 54137 | $23,598 |
92 | David M Dufeck | Pound, WI 54161 | $23,555 |
93 | Gary Hansen | Gillett, WI 54124 | $23,122 |
94 | Jeffrey B Shallow | Lena, WI 54139 | $22,706 |
95 | Richard A Nooyen | Pulaski, WI 54162 | $22,240 |
96 | Sue Sikorski | Krakow, WI 54137 | $21,475 |
97 | Ryan Raymond Brock | Gillett, WI 54124 | $21,304 |
98 | Bonnie Kaczmarowski | Pulaski, WI 54162 | $21,248 |
99 | Burrack Farms LLC | Suring, WI 54174 | $21,123 |
100 | Staidl Farms LLC | Peshtigo, WI 54157 | $20,046 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”