Total Commodity Programs in Oconto County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 2,162
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Oconto County, Wisconsin totaled $116,383,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Sellen's Inc | Oconto Falls, WI 54154 | $330,118 |
82 | Alan James Riegert | Suring, WI 54174 | $328,129 |
83 | Steven Kusch | Abrams, WI 54101 | $324,460 |
84 | Peter Steffel | Oconto Falls, WI 54154 | $319,352 |
85 | Gary Michael Harley | Coleman, WI 54112 | $316,198 |
86 | Philip John Fendryk | Oconto, WI 54153 | $315,790 |
87 | Dean Hansen | Gillett, WI 54124 | $308,212 |
88 | Benjamin M Schaal | Gillett, WI 54124 | $302,589 |
89 | Alan P Shallow | Lena, WI 54139 | $298,799 |
90 | Nicholas Kenneth Krause | Gillett, WI 54124 | $297,129 |
91 | James Nerenhausen | Oshkosh, WI 54903 | $291,049 |
92 | Bryan Matthew Johnson | Sobieski, WI 54171 | $290,732 |
93 | Phillip Tachick | Suring, WI 54174 | $288,544 |
94 | Russell Kostreva | Pound, WI 54161 | $286,056 |
95 | Richard M Fischer | Pulaski, WI 54162 | $281,448 |
96 | Fabry Farms LLC | Oconto Falls, WI 54154 | $281,269 |
97 | Jeffrey J Brabant | Oconto, WI 54153 | $279,103 |
98 | H-w Farms LLC | Oconto Falls, WI 54154 | $278,637 |
99 | Bradley W Seiltz | Pulaski, WI 54162 | $276,699 |
100 | Steven Timothy Borkovec | Lena, WI 54139 | $266,265 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”