Conservation Reserve Program in Oconto County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 452
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Oconto County, Wisconsin totaled $5,402,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | James M Kugel | Lena, WI 54139 | $18,898 |
102 | Donald Dehut | Oconto, WI 54153 | $18,857 |
103 | Arnold Eggebrecht | Gillett, WI 54124 | $18,583 |
104 | Wm Montgomery | Oconto Falls, WI 54154 | $18,541 |
105 | Calvin Compe | Pound, WI 54161 | $18,414 |
106 | Bernadine Dombrowski | Krakow, WI 54137 | $18,111 |
107 | Robert Hoehne | Lena, WI 54139 | $17,712 |
108 | Alvin Schroeder | Oconto Falls, WI 54154 | $17,704 |
109 | Jaci Yoap | Pound, WI 54161 | $17,463 |
110 | Clarence Van Hefty | Lena, WI 54139 | $17,458 |
111 | Herbert J & Caroline Grover Joint Revocable Trust | Gresham, WI 54128 | $17,327 |
112 | Thomas Heimke | Lena, WI 54139 | $17,025 |
113 | Darlene Kapelke | Milwaukee, WI 53219 | $17,003 |
114 | Arndt Inc | Lena, WI 54139 | $16,784 |
115 | Anthony Finger Estate | Bloomington, IN 47408 | $16,401 |
116 | John Robaidek | Green Bay, WI 54304 | $16,037 |
117 | Ray Younger | Lena, WI 54139 | $15,968 |
118 | La Count Dairy Farms Inc | Sobieski, WI 54171 | $15,757 |
119 | Lyle Fisher | Suring, WI 54174 | $15,730 |
120 | Harry Schulz | Suring, WI 54174 | $15,705 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”