Total Disaster Programs in Oconto County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 436
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Oconto County, Wisconsin totaled $11,016,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Nerfarms LLC | Oconto, WI 54153 | $25,003 |
102 | Allen John Noll | Coleman, WI 54112 | $24,869 |
103 | Alan J Heistad | White Lake, WI 54491 | $24,624 |
104 | Raymond Rybka | Abrams, WI 54101 | $24,621 |
105 | Ryan Raymond Brock | Gillett, WI 54124 | $24,550 |
106 | Maxine Dembski | Gillett, WI 54124 | $24,284 |
107 | Benjamin Michael Rudnick | Pulaski, WI 54162 | $24,274 |
108 | Dale Gordon Behnke | Lena, WI 54139 | $24,242 |
109 | Barbara Bergh | Abrams, WI 54101 | $24,200 |
110 | Mccarthy Family Farm LLC | Gillett, WI 54124 | $23,122 |
111 | Virtues Farms LLC | Little Suamico, WI 54141 | $21,650 |
112 | Larry Schultz | Little Suamico, WI 54141 | $21,096 |
113 | Jared Ervin Kostreva | Abrams, WI 54101 | $21,074 |
114 | Reginald Comins | Lena, WI 54139 | $20,618 |
115 | Arndt Inc | Lena, WI 54139 | $20,566 |
116 | , | $20,033 | |
117 | Staidl Farms LLC | Peshtigo, WI 54157 | $19,969 |
118 | Russell Madson | Oconto, WI 54153 | $19,870 |
119 | Thomas Gilles | Lena, WI 54139 | $19,803 |
120 | Dennis Roger Matelski | Suring, WI 54174 | $19,565 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”