Farm Subsidy information
Oconto County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Oconto County, Wisconsin, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,421
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Oconto County, Wisconsin totaled $175,658,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Hallada Farms Inc | Lena, WI 54139 | $844,651 |
22 | Alsteen Farms LLC | Lena, WI 54139 | $830,298 |
23 | Paul Madson Custom Farming LLC | Lena, WI 54139 | $807,417 |
24 | Gohr Farms Inc | Sobieski, WI 54171 | $795,683 |
25 | Kohls Dairy Farm LLC | Gillett, WI 54124 | $773,259 |
26 | Golden Corners Dairy LLC | Oconto Falls, WI 54154 | $772,406 |
27 | Ronald Robert Wussow | Cecil, WI 54111 | $769,331 |
28 | Brian Watts Inc | Oconto, WI 54153 | $765,223 |
29 | O'harrow's Inc | Oconto Falls, WI 54154 | $765,131 |
30 | Charles Walter Kehl | Lena, WI 54139 | $735,166 |
31 | James Bernard Mahoney | Suring, WI 54174 | $716,797 |
32 | Engebretsen Brothers LLC | Cecil, WI 54111 | $709,210 |
33 | Mccarthy Family Farm LLC | Gillett, WI 54124 | $686,212 |
34 | Ryan Raymond Brock | Gillett, WI 54124 | $675,207 |
35 | D And K Farms Inc | Little Suamico, WI 54141 | $674,135 |
36 | Jody Lauersdorf | Gillett, WI 54124 | $665,736 |
37 | Jonathan Wesley Herzog | Gillett, WI 54124 | $664,878 |
38 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $635,273 |
39 | Riegert Farms LLC | Suring, WI 54174 | $631,474 |
40 | Luther Farms LLC | Gillett, WI 54124 | $628,852 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”