Farm Subsidy information
Outagamie County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Outagamie County, Wisconsin, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 263
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Outagamie County, Wisconsin totaled $8,914,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Stedl's Custom Farming LLC | Seymour, WI 54165 | $33,088 |
22 | Witterholt's Family Farm, LLC | Black Creek, WI 54106 | $31,517 |
23 | Steven Lee Schinke | Shiocton, WI 54170 | $29,688 |
24 | Sugar Creek Farm LLC | New London, WI 54961 | $29,577 |
25 | Carlton Stephen Jordan | De Pere, WI 54115 | $29,352 |
26 | Ryan F Martin | New London, WI 54961 | $27,656 |
27 | Larrand Dairy Inc | De Pere, WI 54115 | $26,539 |
28 | Hartleben Farms LLC | Tilleda, WI 54978 | $26,325 |
29 | Michael G Van Asten | Kaukauna, WI 54130 | $25,634 |
30 | William W Bodde | Kaukauna, WI 54130 | $25,105 |
31 | Huebner Farms LLC | Kaukauna, WI 54130 | $24,316 |
32 | John Michael Vander Zanden | Seymour, WI 54165 | $24,294 |
33 | J & J Spreading LLC | Shiocton, WI 54170 | $22,352 |
34 | Herman Bros Farms LLC | Seymour, WI 54165 | $21,200 |
35 | Erickson Dairy Farm LLC | Bear Creek, WI 54922 | $20,772 |
36 | Jeffrey J Liebergen | Seymour, WI 54165 | $19,571 |
37 | Patrick J Van Lanen | Seymour, WI 54165 | $18,939 |
38 | Scott W Schaumberg | Seymour, WI 54165 | $17,816 |
39 | Scott G Marcks | Black Creek, WI 54106 | $17,488 |
40 | Leon L Sprangers | De Pere, WI 54115 | $16,973 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”