Dairy Programs in Outagamie County, Wisconsin, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 116
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Outagamie County, Wisconsin totaled $674,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Mitchell D Hovell | Seymour, WI 54165 | $2,479 |
82 | Mark L Petersen | Appleton, WI 54913 | $2,318 |
83 | Peter J Leisgang | Seymour, WI 54165 | $2,220 |
84 | Vince Keith Malueg | Black Creek, WI 54106 | $2,167 |
85 | Jonathan J Henry | Shiocton, WI 54170 | $2,131 |
86 | Gerald D Biese | Seymour, WI 54165 | $2,113 |
87 | Clinton James Mueller | Black Creek, WI 54106 | $2,096 |
88 | Richard E Fischer | Seymour, WI 54165 | $2,040 |
89 | Timothy A Schultz | Seymour, WI 54165 | $2,030 |
90 | Kevin F Marcks | Seymour, WI 54165 | $1,982 |
91 | Mark Dale Schmidt | Shiocton, WI 54170 | $1,923 |
92 | Andy Joseph Hopfensperger | Seymour, WI 54165 | $1,899 |
93 | James A Julius | Appleton, WI 54914 | $1,880 |
94 | Olivia Rose Hennes | Seymour, WI 54165 | $1,779 |
95 | Donald A Boyea | Seymour, WI 54165 | $1,729 |
96 | Stephen L Bergmann | Hortonville, WI 54944 | $1,721 |
97 | James R Beyer | Seymour, WI 54165 | $1,706 |
98 | Matthew Carl Ver Voort | Hortonville, WI 54944 | $1,673 |
99 | Kurt A Gagnow | Seymour, WI 54165 | $1,590 |
100 | Randy L Dorow | Hortonville, WI 54944 | $1,582 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”