Farm Subsidy information
Outagamie County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Outagamie County, Wisconsin, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 330
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Outagamie County, Wisconsin totaled $13,595,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | John William Schmidt | Appleton, WI 54913 | $12,599 |
122 | Ltvs Farms LLC | Shiocton, WI 54170 | $11,875 |
123 | Travis J Van De Hey Dba Caliber Custom Services Ll | Kaukauna, WI 54130 | $11,322 |
124 | Dwight T Korth | New London, WI 54961 | $10,618 |
125 | Edwin D Singler | Shiocton, WI 54170 | $10,001 |
126 | Patrick D O'brien | Black Creek, WI 54106 | $8,979 |
127 | Timothy A Schultz | Seymour, WI 54165 | $8,467 |
128 | Gary Lee Handrich | New London, WI 54961 | $7,882 |
129 | Carlton Stephen Jordan | De Pere, WI 54115 | $7,705 |
130 | Lloyd E Techlin | Appleton, WI 54913 | $7,427 |
131 | William R Wittlin | Black Creek, WI 54106 | $7,357 |
132 | New Ag Services LLC | Hortonville, WI 54944 | $6,775 |
133 | Barbara J Schmidt | Appleton, WI 54913 | $6,306 |
134 | Patricia Woods | Seymour, WI 54165 | $5,745 |
135 | Chris A Van Dyke | Seymour, WI 54165 | $5,686 |
136 | Robert Voigt Farms LLC | Black Creek, WI 54106 | $5,508 |
137 | , | $5,321 | |
138 | Stedl's Custom Farming LLC | Seymour, WI 54165 | $5,084 |
139 | James K Clegg | Hortonville, WI 54944 | $4,792 |
140 | Ryan L Singler | New London, WI 54961 | $4,770 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”