Farm Subsidy information
Pepin County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Pepin County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,253
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Pepin County, Wisconsin totaled $88,501,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Kristopher L Sabelko | Eau Galle, WI 54737 | $201,316 |
82 | Spindler Dairy Inc | Durand, WI 54736 | $201,144 |
83 | Lawrence W Drier | Eau Galle, WI 54737 | $199,211 |
84 | Richard Traun | Plum City, WI 54761 | $198,556 |
85 | Tmr Custom Work Llp | Durand, WI 54736 | $195,574 |
86 | Roderic J Bauer | Durand, WI 54736 | $195,374 |
87 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $194,474 |
88 | Bauer's Oak View Dairy LLC | Durand, WI 54736 | $194,095 |
89 | William J Bauer | Durand, WI 54736 | $193,982 |
90 | Joseph R Brantner | Mondovi, WI 54755 | $191,475 |
91 | David E Bauer | Durand, WI 54736 | $189,328 |
92 | Loren L Risler | Mondovi, WI 54755 | $188,064 |
93 | Joseph C Gilles | Arkansaw, WI 54721 | $186,787 |
94 | Kosok Bros Partnership Llp | Pepin, WI 54759 | $186,539 |
95 | John T Drier | Plum City, WI 54761 | $183,730 |
96 | Gary M Gates | Arkansaw, WI 54721 | $181,458 |
97 | Joseph R Fedie Jr | Mondovi, WI 54755 | $181,387 |
98 | Andrew Komisar | Pepin, WI 54759 | $180,719 |
99 | Von Holtum Farms Ptr | Plum City, WI 54761 | $180,591 |
100 | Homestead Dairy Farms | Durand, WI 54736 | $179,016 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”