Counter Cyclical Program in Pierce County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 777
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Pierce County, Wisconsin totaled $4,562,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Dennis R Anderson | Hager City, WI 54014 | $25,161 |
42 | Jason Wayne Acker | Bay City, WI 54723 | $24,955 |
43 | Roger Caturia | Plum City, WI 54761 | $23,926 |
44 | Trim Bel Valley Dairy | Beldenville, WI 54003 | $23,652 |
45 | Mary C Acker | Bay City, WI 54723 | $23,306 |
46 | Tee Pee Ridge Inc | Plum City, WI 54761 | $22,563 |
47 | Charles Paul Most | Prescott, WI 54021 | $22,384 |
48 | Peter Joseph Most | River Falls, WI 54022 | $22,384 |
49 | Lyle Marvin Hofacker | Plum City, WI 54761 | $22,178 |
50 | Esterbys Double D Dairy | Ellsworth, WI 54011 | $22,061 |
51 | James A Langer | Ellsworth, WI 54011 | $21,397 |
52 | Matzek Farms Inc | Hager City, WI 54014 | $21,315 |
53 | Stanley M Boles | Prescott, WI 54021 | $20,100 |
54 | Sheldon C Huppert | Ellsworth, WI 54011 | $19,555 |
55 | Sukowatey Farms Inc | Spring Valley, WI 54767 | $19,545 |
56 | Radkey Farms Inc | Beldenville, WI 54003 | $19,264 |
57 | O'neil Farms Inc | Ellsworth, WI 54011 | $19,094 |
58 | Maple Grove Dairy Inc | Elmwood, WI 54740 | $18,664 |
59 | Hines Ranch Inc | Ellsworth, WI 54011 | $18,487 |
60 | Timothy Truttmann | Hager City, WI 54014 | $18,443 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”