Market Loss Assistance Program in Pierce County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,115
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Pierce County, Wisconsin totaled $10,536,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Lyle Marvin Hofacker | Plum City, WI 54761 | $44,389 |
42 | Herbison Inc | Plum City, WI 54761 | $44,122 |
43 | Ronald J Webster | Ellsworth, WI 54011 | $41,904 |
44 | Gregory G Nelson | Spring Valley, WI 54767 | $41,883 |
45 | Luebker Dairy Farms Inc | Plum City, WI 54761 | $41,623 |
46 | David E Meyer | River Falls, WI 54022 | $41,282 |
47 | Don L Rohl | Ellsworth, WI 54011 | $41,181 |
48 | Brian J Webster | Bay City, WI 54723 | $41,158 |
49 | Jensen Contour Dairy Inc | Spring Valley, WI 54767 | $40,528 |
50 | Sheldon C Huppert | Ellsworth, WI 54011 | $39,636 |
51 | Roger Caturia | Plum City, WI 54761 | $39,286 |
52 | Esterbys Double D Dairy | Ellsworth, WI 54011 | $39,091 |
53 | Quarry Heights Farms Ltd | Elmwood, WI 54740 | $38,690 |
54 | Ralph R Matzek | Maiden Rock, WI 54750 | $37,887 |
55 | Donald G Nellessen | Spring Valley, WI 54767 | $36,716 |
56 | Mitchell C Nelson | Stockholm, WI 54769 | $36,531 |
57 | Timothy Truttmann | Hager City, WI 54014 | $36,029 |
58 | Mosts Sunny Acres Farms Inc | Prescott, WI 54021 | $35,805 |
59 | Maple Grove Dairy Inc | Elmwood, WI 54740 | $35,309 |
60 | Christiansens Dairy Inc | Hager City, WI 54014 | $35,146 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”