Counter Cyclical Program in Pierce County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 777
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Pierce County, Wisconsin totaled $4,562,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Thomas J Nelson | Plum City, WI 54761 | $14,055 |
82 | James G Nelson | Plum City, WI 54761 | $14,055 |
83 | Norman Beskar | Prescott, WI 54021 | $13,958 |
84 | Larry W Young | Ellsworth, WI 54011 | $13,656 |
85 | Timothy B Bates | Elmwood, WI 54740 | $13,631 |
86 | Murphy Brothers | Hager City, WI 54014 | $13,268 |
87 | Big Acres Inc | Prescott, WI 54021 | $13,055 |
88 | Kopps Ono Acres Inc | Maiden Rock, WI 54750 | $13,011 |
89 | Dabet Inc | Plum City, WI 54761 | $12,710 |
90 | Don L Rohl | Ellsworth, WI 54011 | $12,529 |
91 | Jensen Contour Dairy Inc | Spring Valley, WI 54767 | $12,488 |
92 | Paul T Huber | Ellsworth, WI 54011 | $12,465 |
93 | Mark P Hildebrandt | Prescott, WI 54021 | $12,339 |
94 | Jerome E Kane | Maiden Rock, WI 54750 | $12,200 |
95 | Ralph R Matzek | Maiden Rock, WI 54750 | $12,200 |
96 | Roman M Huppert | Ellsworth, WI 54011 | $11,924 |
97 | William L Most | Prescott, WI 54021 | $11,296 |
98 | Most Holsteins Inc | Prescott, WI 54021 | $11,127 |
99 | Phillip G Verges | Spring Valley, WI 54767 | $11,123 |
100 | Weiss Dairy Ltd | Plum City, WI 54761 | $10,994 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”