Market Loss Assistance Program in Pierce County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,115
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Pierce County, Wisconsin totaled $10,536,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Dawn M Daleiden | Maiden Rock, WI 54750 | $30,728 |
82 | Charles R And James M Matzek | Hager City, WI 54014 | $30,726 |
83 | Shafer Acres Inc | Elmwood, WI 54740 | $30,313 |
84 | Dwayne William Johnson | River Falls, WI 54022 | $30,120 |
85 | Ti-shi Dairy Inc | Elmwood, WI 54740 | $30,088 |
86 | O'neil Farms Inc | Ellsworth, WI 54011 | $30,014 |
87 | Dabet Inc | Plum City, WI 54761 | $29,915 |
88 | Hager Farms | Bay City, WI 54723 | $29,805 |
89 | James A Langer | Ellsworth, WI 54011 | $29,632 |
90 | Jerry D Edgar | River Falls, WI 54022 | $29,343 |
91 | Randy Bob Hildebrandt | Prescott, WI 54021 | $29,320 |
92 | Rick Jamie Hildebrandt | Prescott, WI 54021 | $29,295 |
93 | Nu-hill Acres Inc | Spring Valley, WI 54767 | $29,238 |
94 | Hines Ranch Inc | Ellsworth, WI 54011 | $28,955 |
95 | Spring Ridge Acres Inc | Elmwood, WI 54740 | $28,853 |
96 | Most Holsteins Inc | Prescott, WI 54021 | $28,721 |
97 | Al-de-ro Farms Inc | Plum City, WI 54761 | $28,569 |
98 | Norman Beskar | Prescott, WI 54021 | $28,326 |
99 | Larry W Young | Ellsworth, WI 54011 | $28,316 |
100 | James B Benitz | Maiden Rock, WI 54750 | $28,124 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”