Farm Subsidy information
Pierce County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Pierce County, Wisconsin, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 656
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Pierce County, Wisconsin totaled $10,401,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | John L Skogen | Elmwood, WI 54740 | $68,336 |
22 | Knutson Family Farms Inc | Beldenville, WI 54003 | $67,476 |
23 | Kevin J Lindstrom | Ellsworth, WI 54011 | $65,132 |
24 | Cole T Hanson | River Falls, WI 54022 | $64,880 |
25 | Donald G Nellessen | Spring Valley, WI 54767 | $63,551 |
26 | Schladweiler Farms Inc | Maiden Rock, WI 54750 | $61,530 |
27 | Double N Farms LLC | Plum City, WI 54761 | $60,314 |
28 | Von Holtum Farms | Plum City, WI 54761 | $59,048 |
29 | Falde Farms LLC | Beldenville, WI 54003 | $58,128 |
30 | Wallace R Franta | Spring Valley, WI 54767 | $55,901 |
31 | Dennis R Anderson | Hager City, WI 54014 | $54,650 |
32 | Geraets Farms LLC | Elmwood, WI 54740 | $53,659 |
33 | Honeycrest Farms Inc | Spring Valley, WI 54767 | $51,018 |
34 | James S Boles | Prescott, WI 54021 | $49,464 |
35 | Hager City Ag LLC | Hager City, WI 54014 | $49,195 |
36 | Leallan J Huppert | Ellsworth, WI 54011 | $49,154 |
37 | Andrew T Esterby | Bay City, WI 54723 | $48,439 |
38 | Prairie View Farms Inc | Hager City, WI 54014 | $47,940 |
39 | Michael J Hildebrandt | Prescott, WI 54021 | $47,779 |
40 | Timothy E Jennings | River Falls, WI 54022 | $46,644 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”