Farm Subsidy information
Pierce County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Pierce County, Wisconsin, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 633
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Pierce County, Wisconsin totaled $12,540,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Alan R Brinkman | Lake City, MN 55041 | $85,608 |
22 | James E Hauschildt | Ellsworth, WI 54011 | $83,828 |
23 | Michael B Webster | Elmwood, WI 54740 | $79,711 |
24 | Timothy B Bates | Elmwood, WI 54740 | $78,391 |
25 | Todd J Mark | Elmwood, WI 54740 | $73,531 |
26 | Schladweiler Farms Inc | Maiden Rock, WI 54750 | $73,042 |
27 | Terry D Lewis | Plum City, WI 54761 | $70,972 |
28 | Fiedler Dairy | Prescott, WI 54021 | $70,635 |
29 | A-team | Bay City, WI 54723 | $70,311 |
30 | Hildebrandt Enterprises LLC | Prescott, WI 54021 | $64,934 |
31 | James S Boles | Prescott, WI 54021 | $61,544 |
32 | Roman M Huppert | Ellsworth, WI 54011 | $60,664 |
33 | Nathan J Sears | Ellsworth, WI 54011 | $58,783 |
34 | Bradley G Saueressig | Hastings, MN 55033 | $57,876 |
35 | Donald G Nellessen | Spring Valley, WI 54767 | $56,353 |
36 | Jacob T Kolodzienski | Beldenville, WI 54003 | $51,729 |
37 | Hince Farms Inc | Plum City, WI 54761 | $49,564 |
38 | Knutson Family Farms Inc | Beldenville, WI 54003 | $48,438 |
39 | Thomas A Borst | Elmwood, WI 54740 | $47,403 |
40 | Patrick T Rohl | Ellsworth, WI 54011 | $46,674 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”