Farm Subsidy information
Polk County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Polk County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 3,358
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Polk County, Wisconsin totaled $200,088,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Nelmeier Dairy Inc | Balsam Lake, WI 54810 | $492,914 |
42 | Tom Beyl | Saint Croix Falls, WI 54024 | $486,816 |
43 | Bruce V Nelson | Clear Lake, WI 54005 | $485,830 |
44 | Je-su-co Farms Inc | Centuria, WI 54824 | $482,792 |
45 | Laursen Farm Inc | Clear Lake, WI 54005 | $473,549 |
46 | Double R Farms Inc | Osceola, WI 54020 | $471,125 |
47 | Harold Levendoski | Clear Lake, WI 54005 | $460,449 |
48 | Thomas H Nonemacher Jr | Clayton, WI 54004 | $443,346 |
49 | Betzoldvale Farms Inc | Amery, WI 54001 | $442,459 |
50 | John D Lundgren | Saint Croix Falls, WI 54024 | $440,170 |
51 | Diamond Lake Dairy Inc | Siren, WI 54872 | $434,717 |
52 | Hansen Farms Inc | Milltown, WI 54858 | $418,463 |
53 | Larry D Michaelson | Balsam Lake, WI 54810 | $415,105 |
54 | R Hanson Land & Cattle Company | Turtle Lake, WI 54889 | $409,942 |
55 | Todd A Kjeseth | Amery, WI 54001 | $409,595 |
56 | Keith W Johnson | Osceola, WI 54020 | $402,368 |
57 | Charles K Wilberg | Osceola, WI 54020 | $396,639 |
58 | Donald L Ellefson | Saint Croix Falls, WI 54024 | $395,618 |
59 | Dueholm Farm LLC | Luck, WI 54853 | $394,957 |
60 | Roger J Neumann | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $393,408 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”