Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Portage County, Wisconsin, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 80
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Portage County, Wisconsin totaled $155,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Myron G Herek | Stevens Point, WI 54482 | $2,346 |
22 | Gordon Miller | Stevens Point, WI 54481 | $2,259 |
23 | Jean Miller | Stevens Point, WI 54481 | $2,259 |
24 | Lee A Chipman | Bancroft, WI 54921 | $2,072 |
25 | James Okeefe | Stevens Point, WI 54481 | $2,067 |
26 | Elizabeth Okeefe | Stevens Point, WI 54481 | $2,066 |
27 | Norbert A Hiess | Custer, WI 54423 | $1,871 |
28 | William Zdroik | Stevens Point, WI 54481 | $1,804 |
29 | Jacquelyn Feltz | Stevens Point, WI 54481 | $1,793 |
30 | Kenneth G Feltz | Stevens Point, WI 54482 | $1,793 |
31 | Stanley Wysocki | Stevens Point, WI 54481 | $1,535 |
32 | Richard J Wilke | Amherst Junction, WI 54407 | $1,510 |
33 | Phyllis Klesmith | Stevens Point, WI 54482 | $1,508 |
34 | James A Sutheimer | Amherst, WI 54406 | $1,500 |
35 | Ken D Butterfield | Stevens Point, WI 54481 | $1,419 |
36 | Michael W Schulist | Custer, WI 54423 | $1,407 |
37 | Benstan C Meils | Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54494 | $1,179 |
38 | David Pozniak | Stevens Point, WI 54481 | $1,103 |
39 | Jeffrey S Klismith | Stevens Point, WI 54482 | $1,091 |
40 | Donna Klismith | Stevens Point, WI 54481 | $1,089 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”