Total Conservation Programs in Portage County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 330
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Portage County, Wisconsin totaled $5,677,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Dane County Conservation League | Madison, WI 53744 | $1,746,328 |
2 | Carl B Flaig | Junction City, WI 54443 | $298,169 |
3 | Jerome Kudronowicz | Stevens Point, WI 54481 | $229,865 |
4 | Melvin O Potter | Bancroft, WI 54921 | $149,511 |
5 | Laura J Zubella | Junction City, WI 54443 | $118,549 |
6 | James Burns & Sons Farms Inc | Almond, WI 54909 | $111,722 |
7 | Casimir Trzebiatowski | Stevens Point, WI 54482 | $110,985 |
8 | Phyllis Burant | Rosholt, WI 54473 | $89,014 |
9 | John A Jazdzewski | Stevens Point, WI 54481 | $82,763 |
10 | Wetlands Conservation League | Stevens Point, WI 54481 | $74,789 |
11 | Plover River Farms | Stevens Point, WI 54481 | $73,170 |
12 | Lorn J Dykes | Almond, WI 54909 | $66,119 |
13 | Roth Golden Acres LLC | Junction City, WI 54443 | $63,180 |
14 | Golden Acres | Junction City, WI 54443 | $58,113 |
15 | Ronald Landwer | Plover, WI 54467 | $57,379 |
16 | Margaret Shaw | Amherst Junction, WI 54407 | $50,600 |
17 | Carol A Sekerka | Rosholt, WI 54473 | $48,494 |
18 | Daniel E Sekerka | Rosholt, WI 54473 | $47,723 |
19 | Richard J Cherney | Junction City, WI 54443 | $46,865 |
20 | Kenneth G Feltz | Stevens Point, WI 54482 | $45,361 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>