Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Racine County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 243
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Racine County, Wisconsin totaled $7,516,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Bird Farms Inc | Kansasville, WI 53139 | $45,581 |
42 | K & K Farms | Big Bend, WI 53103 | $43,164 |
43 | David W Moyer | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $42,479 |
44 | Balfanz Rev Trust Dated March 13, | Waterford, WI 53185 | $40,346 |
45 | Mark J Wilson | Burlington, WI 53105 | $40,301 |
46 | Paul Johnsen | Franksville, WI 53126 | $40,261 |
47 | John Strueder | Franksville, WI 53126 | $40,184 |
48 | Schaal Dairy Farm Llp | Burlington, WI 53105 | $39,922 |
49 | Roger Demoulpied | Caledonia, WI 53108 | $38,768 |
50 | Greenmonte Farms Inc | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $37,727 |
51 | Robert Ryterski Jr | Franksville, WI 53126 | $35,709 |
52 | Zenner Farm Inc | Mount Pleasant, WI 53177 | $35,693 |
53 | Tom N Treffinger Jr | Waterford, WI 53185 | $34,257 |
54 | Brian Schaal | Burlington, WI 53105 | $34,039 |
55 | Charles Mealy | Kansasville, WI 53139 | $33,552 |
56 | Elderbrook Farms | Burlington, WI 53105 | $33,163 |
57 | W James Schmidt | Waterford, WI 53185 | $33,159 |
58 | Michael J Nolan | Kansasville, WI 53139 | $32,692 |
59 | Lauber Farm LLC | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $32,408 |
60 | Thomas Greil | Waterford, WI 53185 | $30,573 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”