Conservation Reserve Program in Racine County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 430
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Racine County, Wisconsin totaled $6,677,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Elizabeth Ann Buchal | Waterford, WI 53185 | $22,725 |
82 | William Hoppe Family Trust | Mukwonago, WI 53149 | $22,612 |
83 | Lynne Hahn | Caledonia, WI 53108 | $22,543 |
84 | Mabel L Zirbes Estate | Wauwatosa, WI 53213 | $22,380 |
85 | William Stoll | Franksville, WI 53126 | $22,239 |
86 | Edward P Peterson | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $22,036 |
87 | Bernice Hoppe | East Troy, WI 53120 | $22,032 |
88 | Gehrand United LLC | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $21,996 |
89 | Joseph M Kojis | Waterford, WI 53185 | $21,792 |
90 | John Devita | Franksville, WI 53126 | $21,692 |
91 | Clearwater Acres II Llp | Waterford, WI 53185 | $21,488 |
92 | Borzynski Farms Inc | Franksville, WI 53126 | $21,220 |
93 | Phd Holdings Llp | Franksville, WI 53126 | $21,106 |
94 | Alice Ludtke | Burlington, WI 53105 | $21,048 |
95 | Howard L Cottingham | Franksville, WI 53126 | $20,655 |
96 | Bruce Beth | Franksville, WI 53126 | $20,496 |
97 | Ronald E Sundre Rev Trust | Caledonia, WI 53108 | $19,456 |
98 | Betty L Wishau | Caledonia, WI 53108 | $19,215 |
99 | Kevin Schmitt | Waterford, WI 53185 | $19,086 |
100 | Edwin Snyder | Burlington, WI 53105 | $18,394 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”