Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Racine County, Wisconsin, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 125
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Racine County, Wisconsin totaled $91,699 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | George L Karczewski | Kansasville, WI 53139 | $864 |
22 | Michael J Nolan | Kansasville, WI 53139 | $773 |
23 | W James Schmidt | Waterford, WI 53185 | $747 |
24 | Andrew S Winski | Waterford, WI 53185 | $742 |
25 | Kenneth L Petersen | Mount Pleasant, WI 53406 | $618 |
26 | Kuiper Family Farms | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $603 |
27 | Oddball Acres, Inc. | Kansasville, WI 53139 | $560 |
28 | Elam H Buttles | Lancaster, WI 53813 | $551 |
29 | Timothy L Eckert | Burlington, WI 53105 | $546 |
30 | K & K Farms | Big Bend, WI 53103 | $542 |
31 | Seth H Scott | Burlington, WI 53105 | $490 |
32 | Dale R Nelson | Racine, WI 53402 | $468 |
33 | Heritage Homestead | Burlington, WI 53105 | $424 |
34 | William Zache | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $397 |
35 | Halter Farms Incorporated | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $370 |
36 | Matthew R Lui | Mt Pleasant, WI 53406 | $366 |
37 | Lone Chestnut Farms LLC | Burlington, WI 53105 | $364 |
38 | Cramer Farm LLC | Mount Pleasant, WI 53403 | $356 |
39 | Stephen C Waldron | Franksville, WI 53126 | $353 |
40 | H Earl Ranke | Waterford, WI 53185 | $343 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”