Total Commodity Programs in Racine County, Wisconsin, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 831
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Racine County, Wisconsin totaled $86,839,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Thomas Greil | Waterford, WI 53185 | $860,884 |
22 | Paul Frost | Waterford, WI 53185 | $832,517 |
23 | Whitley Farms Inc | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $802,783 |
24 | Kevin Whitley Farms | Sturtevant, WI 53177 | $800,801 |
25 | Schaal Dairy Farm Llp | Burlington, WI 53105 | $740,426 |
26 | Keith M Heineck | Franksville, WI 53126 | $688,484 |
27 | Stanley Czahor Jr | Burlington, WI 53105 | $685,136 |
28 | Barbara Czahor | Burlington, WI 53105 | $663,628 |
29 | W James Schmidt | Waterford, WI 53185 | $659,060 |
30 | Skewes Farms Inc | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $656,450 |
31 | Greenmonte Farms Inc | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $647,116 |
32 | Mark J Wilson | Burlington, WI 53105 | $618,259 |
33 | August J Storck & Laverne V Storc | Kansasville, WI 53139 | $586,631 |
34 | Robert Vyvyan Inc | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $572,436 |
35 | Kenneth L Petersen | Mount Pleasant, WI 53406 | $572,020 |
36 | Elderbrook Farms | Burlington, WI 53105 | $552,996 |
37 | Robert Grove | Caledonia, WI 53108 | $552,457 |
38 | Donald J Bonner | Kansasville, WI 53139 | $542,301 |
39 | Henderson Seed Farm Corp | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $528,501 |
40 | Ken & Jim Petersen Farms | Caledonia, WI 53108 | $525,701 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”