Total Commodity Programs in Racine County, Wisconsin, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 67
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Racine County, Wisconsin totaled $1,244,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Paul Frost Farms LLC | Waterford, WI 53185 | $149,429 |
2 | , | $135,599 | |
3 | Schaal Dairy Farm Llp | Burlington, WI 53105 | $129,742 |
4 | Saltzmann Family Farm, LLC | Waterford, WI 53185 | $125,119 |
5 | Mark J Wilson | Burlington, WI 53105 | $120,630 |
6 | Kay Scott | Franksville, WI 53126 | $96,279 |
7 | Jacqueline R Bratz | Franksville, WI 53126 | $82,639 |
8 | Lone Chestnut Farms LLC | Burlington, WI 53105 | $75,233 |
9 | Orchard Vu Holsteins LLC | Waterford, WI 53185 | $49,225 |
10 | Greenmonte Farms Inc | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $47,300 |
11 | Elderbrook Farms | Burlington, WI 53105 | $46,714 |
12 | Lauber Farm LLC | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $40,648 |
13 | Roger Beitzel Jr | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $32,240 |
14 | Jill Jacobs | Waterford, WI 53185 | $20,017 |
15 | Himebauch Farms Llp | East Troy, WI 53120 | $18,104 |
16 | Robert E Funk Farms Inc | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $11,939 |
17 | Helding Farms Inc | Franksville, WI 53126 | $11,875 |
18 | Jeffery L Paap | Franksville, WI 53126 | $7,140 |
19 | Creuziger Enterprises Inc | Mount Pleasant, WI 53177 | $4,176 |
20 | Brightonwoods Orchard Inc | Burlington, WI 53105 | $3,727 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>