Margin Protection Program in Saint Croix County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 117
Recipients of Margin Protection Program from farms in Saint Croix County, Wisconsin totaled $1,108,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Margin Protection Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Lee Seim | Glenwood City, WI 54013 | $15,084 |
22 | Crisdhome Farm Inc | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $15,035 |
23 | Nadeau Holsteins LLC | Glenwood City, WI 54013 | $14,478 |
24 | Wink Dairy Farms LLC | Glenwood City, WI 54013 | $14,415 |
25 | Ter Rae Farms Inc | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $13,920 |
26 | Dnd Dairy LLC | Emerald, WI 54013 | $13,374 |
27 | Neu-view Acres LLC | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $13,058 |
28 | Fouks Farms Inc | Deer Park, WI 54007 | $12,762 |
29 | Stanley Gausman | Baldwin, WI 54002 | $12,316 |
30 | Terry And Larry Bazille | Emerald, WI 54013 | $12,124 |
31 | Kyle Van Roekel | Baldwin, WI 54002 | $12,103 |
32 | Shelley Wink | Glenwood City, WI 54013 | $11,521 |
33 | Bradley Dorwin | Glenwood City, WI 54013 | $10,923 |
34 | Charles Brent Tommerdahl | Hudson, WI 54016 | $10,844 |
35 | Joe Kusilek | Baldwin, WI 54002 | $10,764 |
36 | Christopher Derosier | Somerset, WI 54025 | $10,749 |
37 | Timothy B Omann | Emerald, WI 54013 | $9,561 |
38 | Melissa A Traiser | Somerset, WI 54025 | $9,552 |
39 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $9,448 |
40 | Daniel E Johnson | River Falls, WI 54022 | $9,335 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”