Total Conservation Programs in Saint Croix County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,845
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Saint Croix County, Wisconsin totaled $39,944,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Lynn W Bourdaghs | Sandy, UT 84093 | $131,599 |
42 | Earl Heinisch | River Falls, WI 54022 | $131,410 |
43 | James Freeman | River Falls, WI 54022 | $130,411 |
44 | Darryle Powers Living Trust | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $130,345 |
45 | Dennis Emmert | Baldwin, WI 54002 | $124,468 |
46 | Duane Wright | Barron, WI 54812 | $123,545 |
47 | Thor Aune | Hammond, WI 54015 | $119,927 |
48 | Vernell Skoglund | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $118,718 |
49 | John H Rivard | Hammond, WI 54015 | $116,881 |
50 | Darrel Folie | Somerset, WI 54025 | $116,817 |
51 | William C O'shea | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $116,640 |
52 | Aaron Palewicz | Glenwood City, WI 54013 | $115,216 |
53 | Walana Ulrich | Clear Lake, WI 54005 | $114,922 |
54 | Michael J Jagielski | Arlington, TX 76012 | $112,447 |
55 | Edmund J Germain | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $111,143 |
56 | Leslie Larson | Baldwin, WI 54002 | $109,952 |
57 | Rex Stockman | Wilson, WI 54027 | $109,108 |
58 | Ernest J Severson Revocable Livin | Clayton, WI 54004 | $108,960 |
59 | Anna Kukuska | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $108,770 |
60 | Randal Ramberg | Baldwin, WI 54002 | $107,843 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”