Total Commodity Programs in Saint Croix County, Wisconsin, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 532
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Saint Croix County, Wisconsin totaled $7,916,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Breezy Hills Farm Of Baldwin Inc | Baldwin, WI 54002 | $37,392 |
62 | Don A Anderson | Hudson, WI 54016 | $37,341 |
63 | David Mckenna | Roberts, WI 54023 | $36,258 |
64 | Erin Mckenna | Roberts, WI 54023 | $36,258 |
65 | Gerard Carufel | Glenwood City, WI 54013 | $35,163 |
66 | West-croix Holsteins LLC | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $34,777 |
67 | Lawrence W Croes | Deer Park, WI 54007 | $33,743 |
68 | Ken-rich Farm Inc | Baldwin, WI 54002 | $32,584 |
69 | Scott E Hoffman | Downing, WI 54734 | $32,451 |
70 | Edward Forliti | Baldwin, WI 54002 | $32,224 |
71 | Richard And Robert Derrick Partnership | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $32,222 |
72 | Michael J Mcnamara | Emerald, WI 54013 | $31,821 |
73 | Kevin Croes | Emerald, WI 54013 | $31,675 |
74 | Michael Flandrick | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $31,672 |
75 | Duane O Thompson | Glenwood City, WI 54013 | $31,629 |
76 | Mark T Smith | Glenwood City, WI 54013 | $30,872 |
77 | John Schottler | Somerset, WI 54025 | $30,750 |
78 | Georgine Schottler | Somerset, WI 54025 | $30,750 |
79 | Daniel Pearson | River Falls, WI 54022 | $28,417 |
80 | Tristan Stoltzfus | Glenwood City, WI 54013 | $28,324 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”