Market Loss Assistance Program in Saint Croix County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,497
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Saint Croix County, Wisconsin totaled $12,153,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Jeffrey J Kircher | Hammond, WI 54015 | $27,266 |
102 | Randy Roquette | Baldwin, WI 54002 | $27,137 |
103 | Kerry Licht | River Falls, WI 54022 | $26,959 |
104 | David Railsback Jr | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $26,925 |
105 | Dan Bee | Wilson, WI 54027 | $26,883 |
106 | Ellen M Hurtgen | Woodville, WI 54028 | $26,587 |
107 | Lloyd Dahlke | Hudson, WI 54016 | $26,366 |
108 | Matthew A Grimm | River Falls, WI 54022 | $26,288 |
109 | Vrieze Farms Inc | Baldwin, WI 54002 | $26,262 |
110 | James A Emmert | Baldwin, WI 54002 | $26,114 |
111 | Clarence Neumann | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $25,928 |
112 | Happy Acres | Baldwin, WI 54002 | $25,695 |
113 | Joe Clennon | Hammond, WI 54015 | $25,667 |
114 | Pioneer Dairy Farm Inc | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $25,633 |
115 | Donald W Brown | River Falls, WI 54022 | $25,626 |
116 | Allen L Hanson | River Falls, WI 54022 | $25,556 |
117 | Richard Heibel | Clear Lake, WI 54005 | $25,327 |
118 | Daniel B Goodwin | Glenwood City, WI 54013 | $25,225 |
119 | Vernon M Nelson | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $25,204 |
120 | Glenn Basel | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $25,138 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”