Total Conservation Programs in Saint Croix County, Wisconsin, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 208
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Saint Croix County, Wisconsin totaled $641,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Stephen J Harrold | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $1,740 |
102 | Greg Jacobson | Woodville, WI 54028 | $1,718 |
103 | Gary Bruns | Somerset, WI 54025 | $1,697 |
104 | , | $1,693 | |
105 | James Heebink | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $1,682 |
106 | Gerard Carufel | Glenwood City, WI 54013 | $1,678 |
107 | Glenda Hansen | Roberts, WI 54023 | $1,671 |
108 | Thomas S Aaby | Baldwin, WI 54002 | $1,621 |
109 | Craig T Tekse | Minneapolis, MN 55422 | $1,615 |
110 | Donald Carufel | Somerset, WI 54025 | $1,584 |
111 | Sally Jilek | River Falls, WI 54022 | $1,543 |
112 | Jacob Crowley | Baldwin, WI 54002 | $1,483 |
113 | Dorwin Farms | Woodville, WI 54028 | $1,400 |
114 | Edward T Joseph | Houlton, WI 54082 | $1,390 |
115 | Renee Tolzman | Somerset, WI 54025 | $1,358 |
116 | Joseph Jackelen | Glenwood City, WI 54013 | $1,343 |
117 | Timmy E Ramberg | Baldwin, WI 54002 | $1,341 |
118 | Michael L Brakke Irrevocable Trust | Somerset, WI 54025 | $1,316 |
119 | Brian F Albee | Roberts, WI 54023 | $1,294 |
120 | Norman Hagen | Glenwood City, WI 54013 | $1,270 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”