Farm Subsidy information
Saint Croix County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Saint Croix County, Wisconsin, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 339
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Saint Croix County, Wisconsin totaled $12,777,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Laton N Henderson | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $2,764 |
142 | Stanley Peskar | Saint Paul, MN 55125 | $2,764 |
143 | Roger B Garbe | Hudson, WI 54016 | $2,700 |
144 | Glenda Hansen | Roberts, WI 54023 | $2,664 |
145 | Douglas Plourde | Somerset, WI 54025 | $2,610 |
146 | Jordan L Logghe | Glenwood City, WI 54013 | $2,541 |
147 | Lavaun Marilyn Trelstad-trelstad Living Trust | Bloomington, MN 55431 | $2,524 |
148 | Benjamin J Rudolph | River Falls, WI 54022 | $2,522 |
149 | Keith Bennett | Baldwin, WI 54002 | $2,515 |
150 | Scott E Coddington | Baldwin, WI 54002 | $2,510 |
151 | Verlyn Falde | Baldwin, WI 54002 | $2,413 |
152 | Jonathan E Nelson | River Falls, WI 54022 | $2,409 |
153 | Eric Timm | Wilson, WI 54027 | $2,390 |
154 | Douglas J Croes | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $2,364 |
155 | Charles Newhouse | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $2,327 |
156 | Gabriel J Flandrick | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $2,273 |
157 | Robert Lancaster | Roberts, WI 54023 | $2,197 |
158 | Paul L Braaten | Lakeville, MN 55044 | $2,187 |
159 | Schulte Brothers | Hammond, WI 54015 | $2,166 |
160 | Kyle B Van Roekel | Baldwin, WI 54002 | $2,150 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”