Production Flexibility Program in Saint Croix County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 1,538
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Saint Croix County, Wisconsin totaled $16,368,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Wahlquist Brothers | Baldwin, WI 54002 | $25,267 |
162 | Harvy Christensen Sr | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $25,210 |
163 | David Schachtner | Somerset, WI 54025 | $24,732 |
164 | Ed Schachtner | Somerset, WI 54025 | $24,732 |
165 | James J Nelson | River Falls, WI 54022 | $24,630 |
166 | Jerry L Emmert | Baldwin, WI 54002 | $24,482 |
167 | John Dalton | Hammond, WI 54015 | $24,441 |
168 | Kenneth Herink | Roberts, WI 54023 | $24,307 |
169 | Kerry Licht | River Falls, WI 54022 | $24,302 |
170 | Fred Ball And Ruth Ball Revocable | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $24,298 |
171 | James E Stringer | Spring Valley, WI 54767 | $24,275 |
172 | Robert Waxon | Hudson, WI 54016 | $24,215 |
173 | Michael B Marshall | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $24,093 |
174 | Forest Hills Dairy | Glenwood City, WI 54013 | $23,904 |
175 | Richard Hesselink | Deer Park, WI 54007 | $23,802 |
176 | William G Van Dyk | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $23,723 |
177 | Gerrit Van Dyk | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $23,723 |
178 | Lowell Volkert | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $23,271 |
179 | Gary Nadeau | Glenwood City, WI 54013 | $23,212 |
180 | Herman Keller Jr | Ellsworth, WI 54011 | $23,189 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”