Farm Subsidy information
Saint Croix County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Saint Croix County, Wisconsin, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 381
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Saint Croix County, Wisconsin totaled $12,207,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Van Dyk Farms Inc | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $88,780 |
2 | Gary J Moelter | River Falls, WI 54022 | $69,960 |
3 | Tellijohn's Dairy, Inc | Emerald, WI 54013 | $65,443 |
4 | Thomas J Jansa | River Falls, WI 54022 | $56,819 |
5 | James T Woodruff | Hudson, WI 54016 | $48,755 |
6 | Frances Heinbuch - Gary W & Frances M Heinbuch Liv | Emerald, WI 54013 | $43,401 |
7 | Dnd Dairy LLC | Emerald, WI 54013 | $39,462 |
8 | Bruce Dahlke | Hudson, WI 54016 | $37,728 |
9 | Goodrich Cylon Dairy LLC | Deer Park, WI 54007 | $36,921 |
10 | West-croix Holsteins LLC | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $36,558 |
11 | Bradley Voeltz | Emerald, WI 54013 | $36,533 |
12 | Dalton Family Farms Llp | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $33,317 |
13 | Luckwaldt Agriculture Inc | Woodville, WI 54028 | $31,694 |
14 | Joseph J O'malley | River Falls, WI 54022 | $30,280 |
15 | Henk Van Dyk | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $29,149 |
16 | David C See | River Falls, WI 54022 | $28,995 |
17 | Lofty Acres Inc | Glenwood City, WI 54013 | $27,658 |
18 | Jon D Waldroff | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $27,179 |
19 | James P Waldroff | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $26,383 |
20 | Stanley Gausman | Baldwin, WI 54002 | $25,865 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>