Loan Deficiency in Sauk County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 995
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Sauk County, Wisconsin totaled $14,494,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | New Age Custom Farming LLC | Prairie Du Sac, WI 53578 | $287,320 |
2 | Hartung Farms | Madison, WI 53717 | $258,900 |
3 | David Shaw | Baraboo, WI 53913 | $235,256 |
4 | Kindschi's Inc | Prairie Du Sac, WI 53578 | $206,088 |
5 | Howard G Hartmann | Prairie Du Sac, WI 53578 | $188,534 |
6 | Timothy R Leidig | Prairie Du Sac, WI 53578 | $188,315 |
7 | E & M Larsen Farms LLC | Baraboo, WI 53913 | $147,918 |
8 | Edward Reimer | Loganville, WI 53943 | $144,603 |
9 | Markley Farms Inc | Prairie Du Sac, WI 53578 | $139,521 |
10 | Maize N Bacon Inc | Sauk City, WI 53583 | $134,044 |
11 | Green Farms, Inc | North Freedom, WI 53951 | $133,092 |
12 | City Side Farms Ltd | Reedsburg, WI 53959 | $124,988 |
13 | Hatz Farms Inc | Prairie Du Sac, WI 53578 | $120,281 |
14 | Gordon L Hartmann Est | Lodi, WI 53555 | $108,896 |
15 | Leatherberry Farms | Baraboo, WI 53913 | $104,072 |
16 | Hutter Farm Inc | Spring Green, WI 53588 | $101,427 |
17 | Robert V Leidig Est | Prairie Du Sac, WI 53578 | $97,909 |
18 | Prairie Agri-ventures LLC | Prairie Du Sac, WI 53578 | $96,614 |
19 | Schlieckau Farm, Inc | Loganville, WI 53943 | $92,249 |
20 | Janice Bergman | Loganville, WI 53943 | $90,231 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>