Total Conservation Programs in Sauk County, Wisconsin, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 257
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Sauk County, Wisconsin totaled $746,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | C Richard & Mary E Garland Irrevocable Trust | Janesville, WI 53545 | $7,672 |
22 | Alt Family Trust | Waunakee, WI 53597 | $7,492 |
23 | Bradley Peck | Spring Green, WI 53588 | $7,444 |
24 | Boettcher Family Llp | North Freedom, WI 53951 | $7,141 |
25 | Dennis Schlieckau | Reedsburg, WI 53959 | $6,643 |
26 | Bindl 2006 Jt Revoc Trust | Williams Bay, WI 53191 | $6,432 |
27 | Harland G Schneider | Reedsburg, WI 53959 | $6,418 |
28 | Tamara S Nuenninghoff | Baraboo, WI 53913 | $6,133 |
29 | Timothy Yelk | Spring Green, WI 53588 | $6,128 |
30 | Charles Carrig | La Valle, WI 53941 | $6,090 |
31 | Lynn Sonnenberg | Eau Claire, WI 54703 | $6,018 |
32 | Kevin Enge Farms LLC | Sauk City, WI 53583 | $5,961 |
33 | John Bergman | Portage, WI 53901 | $5,870 |
34 | Philip J Terry | Madison, WI 53714 | $5,303 |
35 | Bear Creek Acres LLC | Lone Rock, WI 53556 | $5,272 |
36 | Dog Hollow Construction LLC | Monona, WI 53716 | $5,199 |
37 | James Kast | Hillpoint, WI 53937 | $5,159 |
38 | Kolleen M Johnson | Cottage Grove, WI 53527 | $5,088 |
39 | Buisker Family LLC | Hillpoint, WI 53937 | $5,024 |
40 | Gerald Radke | Loganville, WI 53943 | $4,780 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”