Market Gains in Sauk County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 122
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Sauk County, Wisconsin totaled $665,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Tonyes J Garrelts | Spring Green, WI 53588 | $3,438 |
42 | Tim R Schultz | Wisconsin Dells, WI 53965 | $3,330 |
43 | Bailey's Fairgreen Farms Inc | Baraboo, WI 53913 | $3,305 |
44 | Ritzer Farms Inc | Reedsburg, WI 53959 | $3,290 |
45 | Gary Cummings | Baraboo, WI 53913 | $3,227 |
46 | Michael Schoenoff | Baraboo, WI 53913 | $3,078 |
47 | Fairfield Center Farms | Baraboo, WI 53913 | $3,042 |
48 | Thorne & Son | , 00000 | $3,004 |
49 | Dean Dorow | Wisconsin Dells, WI 53965 | $3,003 |
50 | Richard Cowles Estate | Reedsburg, WI 53959 | $2,960 |
51 | Litscher Family Limited Partnership | Baraboo, WI 53913 | $2,881 |
52 | Clinton E Clingerman | Baraboo, WI 53913 | $2,706 |
53 | New Age Custom Farming LLC | Prairie Du Sac, WI 53578 | $2,657 |
54 | Todd Nehring | North Freedom, WI 53951 | $2,627 |
55 | David Schulte | Hillpoint, WI 53937 | $2,594 |
56 | Bindl Bros | Spring Green, WI 53588 | $2,590 |
57 | Mike Wehler | Plain, WI 53577 | $2,531 |
58 | Frank Shimniok | North Freedom, WI 53951 | $2,475 |
59 | Daniel Ganser Est | Prairie Du Sac, WI 53578 | $2,236 |
60 | Litchlann Inc | Baraboo, WI 53913 | $2,145 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”