Conservation Reserve Program in Sauk County, Wisconsin, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 292
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Sauk County, Wisconsin totaled $618,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Jeffrey A Johnson | La Valle, WI 53941 | $1,578 |
122 | Jim & Judy Laubmeier Rev Lv Tr | Cross Plains, WI 53528 | $1,575 |
123 | Cornelius C Ryan Living Trust | Madison, WI 53704 | $1,572 |
124 | Ross Lynch | Lake Tomahawk, WI 54539 | $1,532 |
125 | Daniel Kruchten | Dane, WI 53529 | $1,524 |
126 | Keith Koenecke | Reedsburg, WI 53959 | $1,486 |
127 | Valentine Gardehl | Neenah, WI 54956 | $1,480 |
128 | James C Hamilton | Beloit, WI 53511 | $1,459 |
129 | Buisker Family LLC | Hillpoint, WI 53937 | $1,456 |
130 | Steven Blakeslee | Reedsburg, WI 53959 | $1,449 |
131 | Gregary J Wipperfurth | Spring Green, WI 53588 | $1,445 |
132 | Dan Paulus | Spring Green, WI 53588 | $1,445 |
133 | Michael F Stanek | Wonewoc, WI 53968 | $1,425 |
134 | Kurt Muchow | Rock Springs, WI 53961 | $1,419 |
135 | Gary Roohr-hyzer | Reedsburg, WI 53959 | $1,411 |
136 | Nathan Duren | Cazenovia, WI 53924 | $1,398 |
137 | Kristin Ann Rothe | Brookfield, WI 53005 | $1,388 |
138 | Kurt A Adler | Mount Horeb, WI 53572 | $1,388 |
139 | Thomas E O'donnell Jr | Prairie Du Sac, WI 53578 | $1,386 |
140 | Dennis D Connors | Reedsburg, WI 53959 | $1,384 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”