Loan Deficiency in Sauk County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 995
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Sauk County, Wisconsin totaled $14,494,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Duane R Lins | Loganville, WI 53943 | $68,093 |
42 | John Eric Neuman | Baraboo, WI 53913 | $67,555 |
43 | Roecker's Rolling Acres LLC | Loganville, WI 53943 | $67,257 |
44 | Garrelts Farm LLC | Spring Green, WI 53588 | $64,150 |
45 | Oak Hill Farms LLC | Hillpoint, WI 53937 | $64,107 |
46 | Robert C Meyer | Hillpoint, WI 53937 | $63,076 |
47 | Ahrensmeyer Farms Inc | Baraboo, WI 53913 | $62,435 |
48 | Harry Zastrow | North Freedom, WI 53951 | $61,116 |
49 | Kevin O Enge Living Trust | Sauk City, WI 53583 | $60,578 |
50 | Gerry Rosenbaum | Plain, WI 53577 | $59,271 |
51 | Kevin Gilding | Prairie Du Sac, WI 53578 | $59,207 |
52 | Just-a-hill Dairy Farms Ltd | Reedsburg, WI 53959 | $58,358 |
53 | Yanke Prairie Farms Ltd | Prairie Du Sac, WI 53578 | $57,756 |
54 | Dan Parsons | Baraboo, WI 53913 | $56,325 |
55 | John David Hasheider | Sauk City, WI 53583 | $55,661 |
56 | Zech's Grand View Farm Inc | Sauk City, WI 53583 | $55,649 |
57 | Joseph L Noltner | Sauk City, WI 53583 | $54,658 |
58 | Maurice Nolden | Prairie Du Sac, WI 53578 | $54,454 |
59 | Jerald W Kaufman | Sauk City, WI 53583 | $54,449 |
60 | L D & R Farms Inc | North Freedom, WI 53951 | $54,373 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”