Farm Subsidy information
Shawano County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Shawano County, Wisconsin, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 284
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Shawano County, Wisconsin totaled $8,901,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Hartleben Farms LLC | Tilleda, WI 54978 | $49,526 |
22 | Josh Britzke | Tigerton, WI 54486 | $49,427 |
23 | Richard Britzke | Tigerton, WI 54486 | $49,160 |
24 | J & J Mueller Farms LLC | Shawano, WI 54166 | $48,986 |
25 | Gregory G Schmidt Revocable Trust | Clintonville, WI 54929 | $47,110 |
26 | Dominic S Mastey | Bonduel, WI 54107 | $44,634 |
27 | Harry L Dillenburg | Shawano, WI 54166 | $39,331 |
28 | Back 40 Acres LLC | Pulaski, WI 54162 | $37,858 |
29 | Timothy Robert Bulger | Cecil, WI 54111 | $36,499 |
30 | Seth's Crops & Shop LLC | Cecil, WI 54111 | $34,845 |
31 | Double Nickel Dairy LLC | Pulaski, WI 54162 | $32,479 |
32 | Alan G Andrus | Birnamwood, WI 54414 | $31,318 |
33 | Zernicke's Landstad Dairy LLC | Bonduel, WI 54107 | $30,553 |
34 | Betley Farms LLC | Pulaski, WI 54162 | $26,894 |
35 | Neil A Christianson Revocable Trust | Shiocton, WI 54170 | $25,549 |
36 | Tommy Lee Styczynski | Gillett, WI 54124 | $25,415 |
37 | Keith J Long | Wittenberg, WI 54499 | $24,783 |
38 | Jason J Ard | Pulaski, WI 54162 | $23,758 |
39 | Garrett Anthony Holewinski | Pulaski, WI 54162 | $23,203 |
40 | Grant William Riesenberg | Shawano, WI 54166 | $22,564 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”