Total Conservation Programs in Shawano County, Wisconsin, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 64
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Shawano County, Wisconsin totaled $47,011 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Douglas L Van Lannen | Krakow, WI 54137 | $745 |
22 | Shebo's Land LLC | Plover, WI 54467 | $741 |
23 | Allan F Behm | Birnamwood, WI 54414 | $690 |
24 | Edward M Adams | Fremont, WI 54940 | $606 |
25 | Sharla M Dedolph | Tigerton, WI 54486 | $605 |
26 | Earl - Earl W And Judy D Schmidt Trust W Schmidt | Birnamwood, WI 54414 | $564 |
27 | Leroy Kaczorowski | Seymour, WI 54165 | $516 |
28 | John Wayne Kauffman | Bonduel, WI 54107 | $493 |
29 | Mark Yuenger | Bonduel, WI 54107 | $445 |
30 | Cynthia Kirschling | Sacramento, CA 95827 | $437 |
31 | Gerald V Krueger | Tigerton, WI 54486 | $378 |
32 | Daniel Wolff | Shawano, WI 54166 | $358 |
33 | , | $354 | |
34 | Frank Suring | Oconto Falls, WI 54154 | $279 |
35 | Scott Wallenfang | Sobieski, WI 54171 | $278 |
36 | Joel Kroenke | Shawano, WI 54166 | $265 |
37 | Dexter Porter | Sheboygan Falls, WI 53085 | $262 |
38 | Jane Dickelman | Shawano, WI 54166 | $262 |
39 | Malueg Revocable Trust Dated 8/27/2003 - 2021 | Bonduel, WI 54107 | $260 |
40 | Lorin Preston | Clintonville, WI 54929 | $237 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”