Total Commodity Programs in Shawano County, Wisconsin, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 183
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Shawano County, Wisconsin totaled $8,792,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Cletus - Cletus & Gloria Kurowski Rev Tr H Kurowsk | Bonduel, WI 54107 | $79,841 |
42 | Gwidt Homestead Farms LLC | Pulaski, WI 54162 | $79,507 |
43 | Hoffman Family Farms LLC | Gresham, WI 54128 | $79,189 |
44 | Karl Steinhauer | Mattoon, WI 54450 | $78,630 |
45 | Brian Roffers | Pulaski, WI 54162 | $75,494 |
46 | Seth's Crops & Shop LLC | Cecil, WI 54111 | $71,220 |
47 | Double Nickel Dairy LLC | Pulaski, WI 54162 | $70,328 |
48 | Birling Farms | Clintonville, WI 54929 | $69,526 |
49 | Back 40 Acres LLC | Pulaski, WI 54162 | $68,755 |
50 | Dominic S Mastey | Bonduel, WI 54107 | $67,974 |
51 | Benjamin Brian Sperberg | Shawano, WI 54166 | $67,121 |
52 | Schmidt Century Farm LLC | Gresham, WI 54128 | $66,570 |
53 | Dillenburg Dairy Farms Inc | Shawano, WI 54166 | $61,700 |
54 | Lance C Albert | Shawano, WI 54166 | $60,916 |
55 | Allan Beran | Birnamwood, WI 54414 | $60,752 |
56 | Kurt A Hafferman | Bowler, WI 54416 | $60,317 |
57 | Timothy R Smith | Pulaski, WI 54162 | $59,863 |
58 | Berg's Family Dairy LLC | Cecil, WI 54111 | $59,345 |
59 | Steven J Onesti | Wittenberg, WI 54499 | $55,659 |
60 | Michael Damrau | Tigerton, WI 54486 | $53,203 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”