Total Commodity Programs in Sheboygan County, Wisconsin, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 157
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Sheboygan County, Wisconsin totaled $7,313,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Sher-home Farms Llp | Random Lake, WI 53075 | $82,042 |
42 | Robert W Lutzke | Elkhart Lake, WI 53020 | $81,967 |
43 | Eric R Breunig | Sheboygan Falls, WI 53085 | $76,945 |
44 | Dusty Lane Farm LLC | Sheboygan Falls, WI 53085 | $75,531 |
45 | Peichl Farms Inc | Sheboygan, WI 53083 | $75,050 |
46 | Split Rail Acres LLC | Waldo, WI 53093 | $73,184 |
47 | Mark D Bohnhoff | Plymouth, WI 53073 | $72,904 |
48 | Stanley N Meinnert | Elkhart Lake, WI 53020 | $70,257 |
49 | Mark H Gartman | Sheboygan, WI 53081 | $63,923 |
50 | Schladweiler Family Farms LLC | Kewaskum, WI 53040 | $63,163 |
51 | Ernst Family Dairy LLC | Glenbeulah, WI 53023 | $57,918 |
52 | Kenneth H Breunig | Sheboygan Falls, WI 53085 | $56,377 |
53 | Goking Livestock LLC | Sheboygan, WI 53083 | $56,334 |
54 | Wayne J Gerlach | Cascade, WI 53011 | $54,791 |
55 | Charles N Clemens | Sheboygan Falls, WI 53085 | $53,232 |
56 | Cen-mar Dairy Farm Inc | Elkhart Lake, WI 53020 | $51,728 |
57 | Riverside Holstein, LLC | Sheboygan Falls, WI 53085 | $51,693 |
58 | William III And Ronald Schultz Prt | Waldo, WI 53093 | $50,319 |
59 | James A Schmidt | Cascade, WI 53011 | $47,921 |
60 | Garret J Hanke | Plymouth, WI 53073 | $47,647 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”