Total Conservation Programs in Trempealeau County, Wisconsin, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 427
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Trempealeau County, Wisconsin totaled $1,467,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Jereczek Homestead Dairy LLC | Dodge, WI 54625 | $3,884 |
122 | John E Hepfler Jr | Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 | $3,808 |
123 | Kim W Randall | Whitehall, WI 54773 | $3,681 |
124 | Richard Filla | Independence, WI 54747 | $3,641 |
125 | Robert F Myers-robert & Priscilla Myers Rev Trust | Prairie Du Sac, WI 53578 | $3,636 |
126 | Roland W Kube | Galesville, WI 54630 | $3,621 |
127 | Earl & Elaine Bonsack Rev Trust | La Crosse, WI 54603 | $3,612 |
128 | Donald Gilbertson | Strum, WI 54770 | $3,570 |
129 | Mary T Cain | Santa Paula, CA 93060 | $3,465 |
130 | Schaefer Family Trust Of 2009 | Whitehall, WI 54773 | $3,235 |
131 | Janet Buley | Augusta, WI 54722 | $3,224 |
132 | Ronald Benrud | Galesville, WI 54630 | $3,167 |
133 | Ronald L Lee | Lakeland, MN 55043 | $3,159 |
134 | John Kolar | Fairchild, WI 54741 | $3,135 |
135 | Chad D Anderson | Ettrick, WI 54627 | $3,051 |
136 | Nicole Ginger Molitor | Hayward, WI 54843 | $3,027 |
137 | Steven Micek | Independence, WI 54747 | $3,019 |
138 | Kirk V Dahl | Eau Claire, WI 54701 | $3,005 |
139 | Rita R Edmunds | Hastings, MN 55033 | $2,941 |
140 | Andrew J Pedersen | Eleva, WI 54738 | $2,936 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”